Opinions
Hendrik Varnholt

«Sustainability means more»

Putin's war of aggression has put the world in a dire position. We see people in Ukraine dying today and we have to fear that a global food crisis will soon kill people in Africa, for example. Where the situation is not life-threatening, it is nevertheless bitter: Rising prices are forcing people into poverty in many places. This first threatens social peace and then destabilizes other parts of the world.

Tuesday, April 5, 2022

The war in Ukraine will therefore change what manufacturers, traders and consumers understand by sustainability. The situation that Putin has put the world in has made Western society aware this it has increasingly been repressing immediate dangers. Anyone whose energy policy has brought about existential dependency on a long-standing unscrupulous autocrat did nothing for sustainability except in the eyes of a short-sighted public. This is also the case with food issues: Anyone who still calls for agricultural set-aside during Putin's war, for example, is clearly living in an extremely small bubble. Ukraine and Russia are largely out of order as wheat suppliers to a significant part of the world. Efficient agriculture in fertile countries such as Germany is now essential for people living in regions where much less growth is taking place.

The idea of ensuring good living conditions for humanity in the long term is important. However, what many companies and consumers so far understand by sustainability is hardly suitable for this purpose. Sustainability is often just a buzzword for environmental protection, especially in the consumer goods sector. The war in Ukraine shows that a world worth living in is only possible if sustainability is also seen as a social goal. Honesty is needed for this. We must admit that solutions that are conceived unilaterally and only for the better-off sometimes soothe the conscience at the expense of others. We need to find a balanced approach – also because only economically successful companies maintain good jobs, pay taxes and develop innovations for a future worth living. All of this is needed to preserve the defense capability and radiance of the Western world – that is, freedom and peace. Without peace and prosperity, the environment and the climate are also lost. Only a few autocrats have so far emerged as environmentalists. Russian tank factories are not known for climate efforts.

Consumers now feel that what seems sustainable is often not sustainable. At a time when global prices are rising and jobs are becoming insecure in many places, interest in the social dimension of sustainability is increasing: It is increasingly about making affordable goods available and securing people an adequate income. This offers consumer goods companies the opportunity to see sustainability less as an advertising buzzword – and to anchor responsible behavior more deeply.

Such a new vision can be demonstrated in the price negotiations, which, in view of the unprecedented cost increases, are often just starting again from the beginning. It is important to protect the interests of companies, consumers and employees in the German consumer goods industry.

Consumers now feel that what seems sustainable is often not sustainable.

Hendrik Varnholt works as a Journalist at "Lebensmittel Zeitung". This article was first published in "Lebensmittel Zeitung" on 18 March 2022.

Reorientation in «genetic engineering»

Raphael Bühlmann

Raphael Bühlmann

Agricultural and business economist FH.

Politics seems resistant to facts

Beat Keller

Beat Keller

Beat Keller ist Professor für Molekulare Pflanzenbiologie an der Universität Zürich

«Plant breeding calls for liberal rules»

Jürg Niklaus

Jürg Niklaus

Jürg Niklaus has a doctorate in law and is an advocate of plant breeding.

More pesticides, more genetic engineering: How we are overcoming hunger.

Markus Somm

Markus Somm

Journalist, publicist, publisher and historian

«The fear of genetically modified plants is unwarranted»

Anke Fossgreen

Anke Fossgreen

Head of Knowledge Team Tamedia

«Politicians must avoid pushing prices up even more»

Babette Sigg Frank

Babette Sigg Frank

President of the Swiss Consumer Forum (KF)

Seizing the opportunity of green biotechnology

Roman Mazzotta

Roman Mazzotta

Country President Syngenta Switzerland

«Sustainability means more»

Hendrik Varnholt

Hendrik Varnholt

Journalist at Lebensmittel Zeitung

«One-third organic farming does not solve the problem»

Olaf Deininger

Olaf Deininger

Development Editor-in-Chief Agrar-Medien

«Ecological methods alone won’t cut it»

Saori Dubourg

Saori Dubourg

“Ecological methods alone won’t cut it”

«Most fears about pesticides are misplaced»

Michelle Miller

Michelle Miller

Columnist at Genetic Literacy Project and AGDaily

Agriculture needs new technologies

Erik Fyrwald

Erik Fyrwald

CEO Syngenta Group

«Modern pesticides can help fight climate change»

Jon Parr

Jon Parr

President of Syngenta Crop Protection

«Who is afraid of the evil GMOs?»

Jürg Vollmer

Jürg Vollmer

Editor-in-Chief of «die grüne» magazine

Content in German

«What plant breeding brings us»

Achim Walter

Achim Walter

Professor of Crop Science, ETH Zurich

Content in German

«Research and work place needs impetus»

Jan Lucht

Jan Lucht

Head of Biotechnology at Scienceindustries

Content in German

«Agriculture plays a major role»

Jan Grenz

Jan Grenz

Lecturer in Sustainability, School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences HAFL

«Understanding nature’s mechanisms better»

Urs Niggli

Urs Niggli

Agricultural scientist and president of Agroecology Science

«For food security, we need genuine Swiss production»

Jil Schuller

Jil Schuller

Editor «BauernZeitung»

«Lay people completely disregard the dose»

Michael Siegrist

Michael Siegrist

Professor of Consumer Behaviour, ETH Zurich

Content in German

«Is organic really healthier?»

Anna Bozzi

Anna Bozzi

Head of Nutrition and Agriculture at scienceindustries

Content in German

«Genetic engineering and environmental protection go hand in hand»

Dr. Teresa Koller

Dr. Teresa Koller

Researcher at the Institute of Plant and Microbiology at the University of Zurich

«The «Greta» generation will rigorously dispel paradigms.»

Bruno Studer

Bruno Studer

Professor for Molecular Plant Breeding, ETH Zurich

Content in German

«Overcoming the urban-rural divide with constructive agricultural policy»

Jürg Vollmer

Jürg Vollmer

Editor-in-Chief of «die grüne» magazine

Content in German

«We protect what we use»

Regina Ammann

Regina Ammann

Head of Business Sustainability, Syngenta Switzerland

Content in German

Related articles

When surveys create fear
New Breeding Technologies

When surveys create fear

Surveys on technologies such as genetic engineering often focus on risks and spread panic instead of promoting a balanced discussion of the pros and cons. A striking example is the environmental indicator of the Federal Statistical Office. Social scientist Angela Bearth is highly critical of the survey. The public debate on new technologies such as genetic engineering or 5G mobile communications is often conducted emotionally. Current surveys encourage this by stirring up fears instead of enabling an objective consideration of risks and benefits. One example of this is the environmental indicator, a survey conducted by the Federal Statistical Office (FSO) on the subject of hazards. Using simplistic questions, it generates distorted perceptions. In an article on the progressive Agrarwende.ch platform of the Eco-Progressive Network association, social scientist Angela Bearth addresses the issue.

False study on crop protection poisoning influences political decisions
Plant protection

False study on crop protection poisoning influences political decisions

In recent years, the alarming news has been making the rounds that 385 million people suffer from crop protection poisoning every year. The claim comes from a study by critics of pesticides. It has been taken up and spread by numerous media and government institutions. The problem: the number is wrong. The study does not even allow for the conclusion, which is why the scientific publisher in question has since withdrawn the study. Nevertheless, it has influenced politics and continues to be cited frequently.

The ideological misuse of «scientific» studies
Knowledge

The ideological misuse of «scientific» studies

Science serves as a basis for political decisions, including in nature conservation. However, a key question is: how trustworthy are the underlying studies and data? An article in the «NZZ am Sonntag» and the explanations provided by Quarks offer revealing perspectives on the quality of scientific studies and the possible misuse of figures.

gfs survey confirms high acceptance of genome editing
Politics

gfs survey confirms high acceptance of genome editing

A large majority of the Swiss population recognises the advantages of targeted plant breeding using genome editing. This is shown by a survey conducted by gfs.bern.