Opinions
Erik Fyrwald

Agriculture needs new technologies

The authorities seem to have recognized the need to make better technologies available to farmers, so that they can cope effectively with climate change and the increase in extreme events. Switzerland should not miss the opportunity to play an important role in this field and make a valuable contribution to food security.

Monday, December 6, 2021

This guest commentary by Erik Fyrwald, CEO Syngenta Group, was first published in Le Temps on 25 August.

Climate change, geopolitical conflicts, rising energy and fertilizer prices are putting farmers around the world under pressure. They need to increase production and efficiency to guarantee food security while reducing their impact on the environment. According to the United Nations, over 800 million people already no longer have access to healthy, affordable food, and the number of people severely impacted by food insecurity has doubled since 2020 to 345 million. At the same time, climate change is causing average temperatures to rise steadily. Droughts and other extreme phenomena are becoming even more frequent, allowing pests and diseases to establish themselves in new regions.

Farmers are doing their best to achieve good harvests despite these difficult circumstances, but calls for the use of better, innovative science-based agricultural technologies are multiplying. Among the most promising is genome editing, led by the CRISPR-Cas method, introduced in 2012 and known as «genetic scissors».

This Nobel Prize-winning technology has long been sidelined. But things are changing: last July, the European Commission announced a revision of its regulations on New Breeding Techniques (NTS) in agriculture. In Switzerland, parliament has instructed the Federal Council to present, by mid-2024 at the latest, draft legislation for risk-based authorization regulations for NTS-derived plants in which no transgenic genetic material has been inserted.

Many farmers agree that access to new technologies is necessary to meet growing challenges. Improved plant varieties deliver higher yields, greater resistance to extreme weather and pests, and healthier soils. They also improve the taste of food and extend shelf life, to the benefit of consumers.

The NTS regulation proposed by the European Commission confirms that genome editing has the potential to deliver these improvements. In the meantime, breeders are producing crops with longer roots that allow sufficient hydration even in prolonged drought, and that help resist violent storms or floods. New hybrid wheat varieties, made more tolerant to extreme climatic stress, have been shown to yield up to 10% more under comparable conditions. In theory, these achievements could also be developed by traditional breeding over a longer period, but NTS enable them to be developed in just a few years. They are an essential resource if we are to achieve our objectives now.

Some fear that companies and research institutes will systematically patent their inventions. In reality, the situation is similar to that of traditional breeding: neither Switzerland nor the EU issues patents on plant varieties. Nor can a plant's properties be patented if they are the result of traditional breeding methods. The cultivation of old varieties using traditional methods is simply not concerned. Only the use of the latest inventions for commercial purposes is subject to licensing.

The new directives proposed by the European Commission to regulate NTS represent a welcome turning point in the political discussions to date. I hope that the Federal Council's proposal will be in line with this development - even though Syngenta no longer carries out breeding activities in Switzerland. As a research and production company, we have a vested interest in ensuring that the environment is conducive to technology, and that Switzerland regains its leading position in a field as important as biotechnology.

Authorization rules for genetically modified crops are being relaxed in a growing number of countries. Research activities are increasing, offering market opportunities and amounting to a growing «democratization» of plant breeding. The authorities seem to have recognized the need to make better technologies available to farmers, so that they can cope effectively with climate change and the increase in extreme events. Switzerland should not miss the opportunity to play an important role in this field and make a valuable contribution to food security.

Kindly note:

We, a non-native editorial team value clear and faultless communication. At times we have to prioritize speed over perfection, utilizing tools, that are still learning.

We are deepL sorry for any observed stylistic or spelling errors.

Reorientation in «genetic engineering»

Raphael Bühlmann

Raphael Bühlmann

Agricultural and business economist FH.

Politics seems resistant to facts

Beat Keller

Beat Keller

Beat Keller ist Professor für Molekulare Pflanzenbiologie an der Universität Zürich

«Plant breeding calls for liberal rules»

Jürg Niklaus

Jürg Niklaus

Jürg Niklaus has a doctorate in law and is an advocate of plant breeding.

More pesticides, more genetic engineering: How we are overcoming hunger.

Markus Somm

Markus Somm

Journalist, publicist, publisher and historian

«The fear of genetically modified plants is unwarranted»

Anke Fossgreen

Anke Fossgreen

Head of Knowledge Team Tamedia

«Politicians must avoid pushing prices up even more»

Babette Sigg Frank

Babette Sigg Frank

President of the Swiss Consumer Forum (KF)

Seizing the opportunity of green biotechnology

Roman Mazzotta

Roman Mazzotta

Country President Syngenta Switzerland

«Sustainability means more»

Hendrik Varnholt

Hendrik Varnholt

Journalist at Lebensmittel Zeitung

«One-third organic farming does not solve the problem»

Olaf Deininger

Olaf Deininger

Development Editor-in-Chief Agrar-Medien

«Ecological methods alone won’t cut it»

Saori Dubourg

Saori Dubourg

“Ecological methods alone won’t cut it”

«Most fears about pesticides are misplaced»

Michelle Miller

Michelle Miller

Columnist at Genetic Literacy Project and AGDaily

Agriculture needs new technologies

Erik Fyrwald

Erik Fyrwald

CEO Syngenta Group

«Modern pesticides can help fight climate change»

Jon Parr

Jon Parr

President of Syngenta Crop Protection

«Who is afraid of the evil GMOs?»

Jürg Vollmer

Jürg Vollmer

Editor-in-Chief of «die grüne» magazine

Content in German

«What plant breeding brings us»

Achim Walter

Achim Walter

Professor of Crop Science, ETH Zurich

Content in German

«Research and work place needs impetus»

Jan Lucht

Jan Lucht

Head of Biotechnology at Scienceindustries

Content in German

«Agriculture plays a major role»

Jan Grenz

Jan Grenz

Lecturer in Sustainability, School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences HAFL

«Understanding nature’s mechanisms better»

Urs Niggli

Urs Niggli

Agricultural scientist and president of Agroecology Science

«For food security, we need genuine Swiss production»

Jil Schuller

Jil Schuller

Editor «BauernZeitung»

«Lay people completely disregard the dose»

Michael Siegrist

Michael Siegrist

Professor of Consumer Behaviour, ETH Zurich

Content in German

«Is organic really healthier?»

Anna Bozzi

Anna Bozzi

Head of Nutrition and Agriculture at scienceindustries

Content in German

«Genetic engineering and environmental protection go hand in hand»

Dr. Teresa Koller

Dr. Teresa Koller

Researcher at the Institute of Plant and Microbiology at the University of Zurich

«The «Greta» generation will rigorously dispel paradigms.»

Bruno Studer

Bruno Studer

Professor for Molecular Plant Breeding, ETH Zurich

Content in German

«Overcoming the urban-rural divide with constructive agricultural policy»

Jürg Vollmer

Jürg Vollmer

Editor-in-Chief of «die grüne» magazine

Content in German

«We protect what we use»

Regina Ammann

Regina Ammann

Head of Business Sustainability, Syngenta Switzerland

Content in German

Related articles

When surveys create fear
New Breeding Technologies

When surveys create fear

Surveys on technologies such as genetic engineering often focus on risks and spread panic instead of promoting a balanced discussion of the pros and cons. A striking example is the environmental indicator of the Federal Statistical Office. Social scientist Angela Bearth is highly critical of the survey. The public debate on new technologies such as genetic engineering or 5G mobile communications is often conducted emotionally. Current surveys encourage this by stirring up fears instead of enabling an objective consideration of risks and benefits. One example of this is the environmental indicator, a survey conducted by the Federal Statistical Office (FSO) on the subject of hazards. Using simplistic questions, it generates distorted perceptions. In an article on the progressive Agrarwende.ch platform of the Eco-Progressive Network association, social scientist Angela Bearth addresses the issue.

False study on crop protection poisoning influences political decisions
Plant protection

False study on crop protection poisoning influences political decisions

In recent years, the alarming news has been making the rounds that 385 million people suffer from crop protection poisoning every year. The claim comes from a study by critics of pesticides. It has been taken up and spread by numerous media and government institutions. The problem: the number is wrong. The study does not even allow for the conclusion, which is why the scientific publisher in question has since withdrawn the study. Nevertheless, it has influenced politics and continues to be cited frequently.

The ideological misuse of «scientific» studies
Knowledge

The ideological misuse of «scientific» studies

Science serves as a basis for political decisions, including in nature conservation. However, a key question is: how trustworthy are the underlying studies and data? An article in the «NZZ am Sonntag» and the explanations provided by Quarks offer revealing perspectives on the quality of scientific studies and the possible misuse of figures.

gfs survey confirms high acceptance of genome editing
Politics

gfs survey confirms high acceptance of genome editing

A large majority of the Swiss population recognises the advantages of targeted plant breeding using genome editing. This is shown by a survey conducted by gfs.bern.