Class action lawsuit over pesticide ban
A proven seed dressing may no longer be used due to a decision of the European Court of Justice. As a result, the pumpkin harvest in Styria, Austria, has been almost completely destroyed. The affected farmers now want to go to court with a class action lawsuit. They are demanding compensation for the crop losses.
Friday, July 7, 2023
Styria in Austria is known for its pumpkin cultivation. Oil pumpkins are mainly grown for the production of pumpkin seed oil. This year, however, Styrian farmers are facing a disaster. The wet and cold weather in the spring has affected the delicate pumpkin seed. In May, the Austrian Broadcasting Corporation was still forecasting crop losses of up to 50 percent. As the "Kronen Zeitung" writes, 6600 hectares of the 8000 hectares on which pumpkins were grown in Styria are now damaged. A food loss unprecedented.
Proven fungicide banned
However, the blame for the enormous crop failures is by far not only the bad weather. Until last year, the Styrian pumpkin seeds were always treated with a proven seed dressing. The sensitive pumpkin seeds could thus be protected from fungal and pest attack in the field. Due to a ruling by the European Court of Justice, the active ingredient Metalaxyl-M could no longer be used this year. The substitute product had little effect in the fields. A large proportion of the pumpkin seeds sown did not germinate.
Farmers lack more and more tools
As reported by the "Kronen Zeitung", the affected pumpkin farmers feel abandoned by the politicians. One farmer tells the newspaper, "We small farmers are being pushed further and further into a corner where sooner or later we won't be able to produce at all." For the affected farmers, it is clear that the switch to a new seed dressing is responsible for the crop failures. They want to be able to use the old and proven crop protection agent again. But for many, this is not enough.
Farmers consider class action lawsuit
The affected farmers want to be compensated for the harvest losses and are considering going to court with a class action lawsuit. Pumpkin farmer Hannes Papst told the "Kronen Zeitung" newspaper: "After all, livelihoods are at stake. It can't be that everyone just brushes themselves off and we're left sitting on our damages." The story shows once again: agriculture cannot be done from an office chair. There must be cooperation with the practitioners - i.e. the farmers. Otherwise, the profession threatens to become unattractive to the next generation. "Our young people need predictability and reliability, otherwise no one will take over our farms anymore," says a concerned pumpkin farmer.
Sources
Kindly note:
We, a non-native editorial team value clear and faultless communication. At times we have to prioritize speed over perfection, utilizing tools, that are still learning.
We are deepL sorry for any observed stylistic or spelling errors.
Related articles
Why a lack of resources is to blame for the low yields in agroecology
Calls for transforming food systems have grown over the past several years. International governance organizations, such as the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), have issued many of these calls. Other calls have come from activist organizations, too numerous to list. A common theme from both the FAO and activists is that the current system is ‘broken’ and requires a complete rethink and overhaul.
From molecule to crop protection product
On average, five crop protection products are approved for the market each year worldwide. Developing new products is challenging, time-consuming and expensive. It takes more than 12 years from the start of the search for a suitable substance to the approval of the market-ready product. The costs amount to more than 300 million US dollars. Every new crop protection product must meet strict requirements. The approval procedures for crop protection products are comparable to those for new drugs.
False study on crop protection poisoning influences political decisions
In recent years, the alarming news has been making the rounds that 385 million people suffer from crop protection poisoning every year. The claim comes from a study by critics of pesticides. It has been taken up and spread by numerous media and government institutions. The problem: the number is wrong. The study does not even allow for the conclusion, which is why the scientific publisher in question has since withdrawn the study. Nevertheless, it has influenced politics and continues to be cited frequently.
Is the industry exporting banned pesticides?
The media is full of stories about Swiss producers of plant protection products exporting pesticides that are banned in Switzerland. Weak regulations in importing countries would be deliberately exploited. However, this does not correspond to the facts. When exporting plant protection products, Swiss manufacturers adhere to strict international standards. In addition, there are certain products for which an approval in Switzerland does not make sense.